Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-05 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Electric violet and Metallic sage | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1640 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 263 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Moto G9 Power's overall score of 78.6. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy Note9 is way older than Moto G9 Power, it's construction is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
Galaxy Note9 features a bit better processor than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note9's memory capacity for games and applications is just as good as the Moto G9 Power one, they have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Moto G9 Power has a much better battery duration than Galaxy Note9, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Power also counts with a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.