Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-11-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than Motorola Moto M, having an 84.5 score against 71.6. The Apple iPhone XS Max is a newer and just a little bit thinner phone than the Motorola Moto M, but it's way heavier. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto M, because it has a better resolution of 1242 x 2688, a just a bit better screen density and a bigger screen.
The Motorola Moto M features a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB. The iPhone XS Max has a quite superior processing power than Motorola Moto M, because although it has 2 less processing cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone XS Max takes a lot better photos and videos than Moto M, because although it has a camera with a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video. The iPhone XS Max counts with a little longer battery life than Moto M, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.