Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black Glare |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone II is way better than the Moto M, with a overall score of 88 against 71.6. The Asus ROG Phone II body is noticeably newer than the Moto M's, although it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a bit better performance than Moto M, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Asus ROG Phone II also has more RAM.
Asus ROG Phone II features a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a bit lower pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Asus ROG Phone II captures greater photos and videos than Moto M, because it has a much better video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Asus ROG Phone II has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. Asus ROG Phone II features a much better battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.