Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-11-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is better than Moto M's 71.6 general score. The Google Pixel 2 is a somewhat lighter cellphone than Moto M, but both are 0.31inches thick. The Google Pixel 2 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto M. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a little better pixel amount per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto M, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Moto M has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. Google Pixel 2 takes way better photos and videos than Moto M, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.