Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than the Moto M, with a 76.4 score against 71.6. The Motorola Droid Turbo design is older, just a little heavier and a lot thicker than the Moto M. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little better processing power than Moto M, because although it has 4 less cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The Moto M has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto M also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 128 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo shoots way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Moto M, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.