Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-11-11 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is better than the Moto M's 71.6 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is newer than the Moto M, it's thicker and heavier. The Moto M features just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto M features a better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a better display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a lot better camera than Moto M, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a lot higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Moto M, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 features a way better battery duration than Moto M, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.