Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is much better than Moto M's 71.6 global score. The Galaxy A80 design is newer than the Moto M's, although it's notably heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little better processing power than Moto M, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto M and the Galaxy A80 count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy A80 has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy A80 features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A80 captures much better pictures and videos than Moto M, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot better (4K) video definition. Galaxy A80 has longer battery duration than Moto M, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.