Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-11-11 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is way better than the Moto M's overall score of 71.6. The Galaxy A90 5G design is newer than the Moto M's, but it's notably heavier and a little bit thicker. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processing power than Moto M, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto M, because although it has a little bit lower pixel count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A90 5G has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Moto M, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures way better photos and videos than Moto M, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot better resolution camera. Galaxy A90 5G has a superior battery performance than Moto M, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.