Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-11-11 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is much better than the Moto M's score of 71.6. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat heavier but thinner than the Moto M, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference. Motorola Moto M counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Moto M has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Motorola Moto M also counts with a just a bit greater display density. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a superior camera than Moto M, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the same video frame rate and a 16 mega pixels camera in the back, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light photos and video.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto M, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Motorola Moto M, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.