Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Metal | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is much better than Motorola Moto M, having a 79.3 score against 71.6. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S6 edge+ is older than the Motorola Moto M, it's construction is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better display than Motorola Moto M, because it has a better display density, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit larger display.
Motorola Moto M features a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Moto M has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto M also has a larger number of cores.
The Motorola Moto M features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 2 percent bigger battery capacity. The Galaxy S6 edge+ takes greater videos and photos than Moto M, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.