Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-11-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P15 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3050mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Moto M, getting a global score of 77.8 against 71.6. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is notably newer and thinner than the Moto M's, although it's also much heavier. Moto M has a much better performing CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better display than Motorola Moto M, because it has a just a little greater pixel number in each display inch, a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a really larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Moto M, because it has a bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto M, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery life than Motorola Moto M, because it has an 87% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.