Compare phones
Motorola Moto X
16 GB| Global Score | |
| 68.1 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-08-01 | 2018-06-18 |
| 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White | Black |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 145.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 312 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 4 is a bit better than the Moto X, with a 73.1 score against 68.1. Even though the LG Stylo 4 is notably heavier than the Moto X, it's much thinner and also way newer. Moto X counts with a little sharper display than LG Stylo 4, although it has a lot worse 1280 x 720px resolution, a lot smaller display and a quite lower display density.
LG Stylo 4 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto X, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Motorola Moto X shoots slightly better videos and photos than LG Stylo 4, although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos, a worse 1920x1080 video resolution and a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Stylo 4 has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X, because it has 32 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Stylo 4 counts with a really longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
The LG Stylo 4 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.