Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68.1 | 72.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3, 4.2.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-08-01 | 2019-03-19 |
| 5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 inches | 6.13 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Green, Red and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 145.00 | $ 151.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1520 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 312 pixels per inch | 271 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Motorola X8 (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7884 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 10.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 30.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Battery | 3400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 13 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A10 has a global score of 72.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X's overall score of 68.1. Both devices we are comparing include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A10 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto X has Android 4.4.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A10 is much heavier than the Motorola Moto X, it's incredibly thinner and also notably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy A10 has a little better processing power than Motorola Moto X, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have 2 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy A10 also counts with a higher number of cores. The Moto X has a more vivid display than Galaxy A10, because although it has a really smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, it also counts with a bit greater display density.
The Galaxy A10 counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Moto X, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. Galaxy A10 features a camera that's very similar to the camera in Moto X, because although the Galaxy A10 has a tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video and a back facing camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A10 features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto X, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A10 is a little more expensive than the Moto X, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.