Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
AT&TXT1097
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is better than the Moto X (2014), with an 81.3 score against 73.4. The LG V35 ThinQ construction is much newer and a lot thinner, but also just a bit heavier than the Moto X (2014). The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, a quite smaller display and a much lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Moto X (2014).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.