Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
AT&TXT1097
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than the Moto X (2014), getting an 89.7 score against 73.4. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction is newer and thinner, but a lot heavier than Moto X (2014). The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a sharper display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S10 Lite features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto X (2014), because it has more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality pictures, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 96 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more money than the Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.