Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
VerizonXT1096
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Moto X (2014), having an 81.3 score against 73.4. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is extremely newer and much thinner than Moto X (2014)'s, although it's also a little heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a little sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a little bit smaller display, a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the display. LG V35 ThinQ features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much longer battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a more mega pixels back facing camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.