Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is much better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Even though iPhone XS Max is way heavier than Motorola Moto X (2014), it's much thinner and incredibly newer. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a little faster CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores (but slower), a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more vivid screen than iPhone XS Max, although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, a way smaller screen and a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. IPhone XS Max has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a way better battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 3179mAh battery size instead of 2300mAh. The iPhone XS Max captures slightly better photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a back-facing camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto X (2014). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Moto X (2014), giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.