Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-08-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Gold | Black |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone AR is a bit better than the Motorola Moto X (2014), having a score of 77.4 against 73.4. Even though the Asus ZenFone AR is heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014), it's thinner and also much newer. Moto X (2014) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone AR, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a lot lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
Asus ZenFone AR features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a little faster processor than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Motorola Moto X (2014) also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Asus ZenFone AR shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Asus ZenFone AR also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low-light environments, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality pictures.
Asus ZenFone AR counts with a very superior battery life than Moto X (2014), because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.