Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is much better than Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 is a incredibly newer device, and it is also just a bit lighter and extremely thinner than the Moto X (2014). Motorola Moto X (2014) features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with just a bit better display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Motorola Moto X (2014) also counts with a quite larger display. Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a lower video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Google Pixel 2 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.