Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a score of 77, which is slightly better than the Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. The LG V20 is a notably newer and much thinner phone than the Moto X (2014), but it's somewhat heavier. The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a bit sharper display than LG V20, although it has a bit smaller display, a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a just a little inferior number of pixels per screen inch.
The LG V20 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Moto X (2014) has a bit better hardware performance than LG V20, because although it has less RAM, and they both have 4 CPU cores, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a graphics processor.
LG V20 features a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 39% greater battery size. LG V20 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG V20 also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and a more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V20 is also by far the cheapest, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.