Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s global score of 73.4. These phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 has a newer 14 version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, counting with a couple additional features. Although Motorola Edge 50 is heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014), it's thinner and way newer.
Moto X (2014) has a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit better looking display than Moto X (2014), because it has a better 1220 x 2712px resolution, a larger screen and a quite better pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 50 takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low light situations, a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.