Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is a bit better than Moto X (2014), with a 79.7 score against 73.4. Although Moto G Stylus is way heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's just a bit thinner and also a lot newer. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but Moto G Stylus has a newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Moto X (2014) has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has lesser RAM and less CPU cores , it also counts with a GPU. Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior camera than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution back camera and a lot larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is also cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.