Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 has a global score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. Galaxy A12's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it is heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A12 has the newer 10 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, offering a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080px resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen. Moto X (2014) has a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU.
The Galaxy A12 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A12 also has a larger camera aperture and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.