Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is better than Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Moto X (2014) counts with Android 5.0 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 construction is a lot newer and a little thinner, but also heavier than Moto X (2014).
Moto X (2014) counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM and 4 less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola Moto X (2014) features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.