Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-09-04 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 310.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is much better than Motorola Moto X (2014), having a general score of 81 against 73.4. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features. Galaxy C9 Pro's body is extremely newer and notably thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014).
Motorola Moto X (2014) counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Moto X (2014) has a sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Moto X (2014) also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
The Moto X (2014) shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower 13 MP resolution camera and a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much better video definition. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Moto X (2014), because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.