Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Moto X (2014), with a general score of 77.8 against 73.4. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version, giving you a lot of extra features. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than the Moto X (2014), it's notably thinner and also incredibly newer.
Moto X (2014) features a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better screen than Motorola Moto X (2014), because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a lot larger display and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a greater camera than Moto X (2014), because it has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger diafragm aperture and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto X (2014), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto X (2014). So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Moto X (2014), letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.