Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a bit better than the Moto X (2014)'s score of 73.4. The Google Pixel 3 is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than the Moto X (2014), although it's just a bit heavier. The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3, although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, a bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Google Pixel 3's processor is very similar to the CPU in Moto X (2014), because although the Google Pixel 3 has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and more cores. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a larger sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos.
The Google Pixel 3 features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 3 counts with improved battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 2915mAh battery size instead of 2300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.