Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s global score of 73.4. LG V35 ThinQ's body is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner than the Moto X (2014)'s, although it's a bit heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto X (2014) has a bit more vivid screen than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a much lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a quite worse display pixel density and a little bit smaller display. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Moto X (2014), because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a higher resolution back camera and a much bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.