Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-09-04 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Gold | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.24 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than the Moto X (2014)'s global score of 73.4. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a a lot newer and thinner phone than the Moto X (2014), although it is also a bit heavier. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing the user lots of additional features and better performance.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) has a little more vivid display than Galaxy S10, although it has a little lower pixels density, a little bit smaller display and a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 6 GB more RAM and more CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto X (2014), because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy S10 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S10 features a very superior battery performance than Moto X (2014), because it has a 48% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a bit more money than the Motorola Moto X (2014), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.