Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-09-04 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gold | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 270.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite design is much newer and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s, but it is incredibly heavier. Moto X (2014) counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better CPU than Moto X (2014), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more cores. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes much better photos and videos than Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a back camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture, a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior battery duration than Moto X (2014), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more than Motorola Moto X (2014), but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.