Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-04 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 270.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a global score of 82.4, which is much better than the Motorola Moto X (2014)'s 73.4 score. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is noticeably heavier than the Motorola Moto X (2014), it's somewhat thinner and incredibly newer. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a more recent 11 version while Motorola Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple additional features and better performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's processing unit is just as good as the Moto X (2014) one, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM. Motorola Moto X (2014) has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger diafragm aperture and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Moto X (2014), because it has a 118 percent greater battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit more expensive than the Moto X (2014), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.