Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2015-09-03 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2022) is better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), with an 86.6 score against 74.1. IPhone SE (2022) is a much newer cellphone, and it's also lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). IPhone SE (2022) has a much more powerful processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same number of cores, the iPhone SE (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bit processing unit.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a little sharper screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a way higher 1440 x 2560px resolution, a larger display and a much higher pixels amount per inch in the display. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a much better memory to store more games and applications than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 49% more battery capacity. Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit better camera than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.