Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is much better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having an 84.5 score against 74.1. The iPhone XS Max body is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner, but also heavier than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The iPhone XS Max counts with a little bit better screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a just a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch and a quite lower 1242 x 2688 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has a SD card slot that allows up to 128 GB. Apple iPhone XS Max features a better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a 64-bit processing unit and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The iPhone XS Max features just a bit better battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3179mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) takes clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a much better 21 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.