Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has an overall score of 84.2, which is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s overall score of 74.1. Although the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is way heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's a lot thinner and also way newer. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a better looking display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little worse pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display.
The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much better performing processing unit than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments, a back camera with much more mega pixels, a way better video definition and a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro features a much better battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.