Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-09-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a general score of 77, which is just a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s overall score of 74.1. LG V20's body is newer, incredibly thinner and a bit lighter than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The LG V20 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V20 and Moto X Pure Edition (2015) have really similar screens, both have a display with the same size, an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution and the same screen density. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) captures a bit better photos and videos than LG V20, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a much better 21 megapixels resolution.
LG V20 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V20 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V20 counts with a bit better battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.