Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| 2015-09-03 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 is just a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a general score of 79.1 against 74.1. The LG V30 design is a lot newer, somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The LG V30 has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a bit bigger display and a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
LG V30 has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V30 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V30 features a little better performance than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The LG V30 features a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.