Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s score of 74.1. The Motorola Droid Turbo construction has the same thickness than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it's just a bit lighter. Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter screen than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a little higher pixels number in each inch in the screen.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB and more internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little better processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also has better 30 fps video frame rate and a better 21 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with better battery life than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 30% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.