Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is slightly better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s global score of 74.1. Moto G Stylus's body is much newer and thinner than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s, although it's a bit heavier. The Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus has a little faster processing unit than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
Moto G Stylus features better battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a superior camera than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos, a lot better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.