Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is much better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a score of 82.3 against 74.1. Samsung Galaxy A60's body is newer, extremely thinner and just a little lighter than Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and more pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy A60 counts with just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking better quality photos and a lot better 21 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A60 has a bit superior battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.