Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-09-03 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting an 84.9 score against 74.1. Although the Galaxy A80 is heavier than the Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit better processor than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 2 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A80 has greater battery duration than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 23 percent greater battery size. Galaxy A80 shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A80 also has a bigger sensor and a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.