Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-09-03 | -- |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a score of 81.5, which is a bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015)'s 74.1 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra's body is much lighter and notably thinner than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has 2 less cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch. The Galaxy S23 Ultra has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S23 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a much higher resolution camera, a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos. The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a superior battery life than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.