Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having a score of 77.8 against 74.1. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), it's thinner and a lot newer. The Moto X Pure Edition (2015) counts with a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking display than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a higher resolution of 2200 x 2480. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a way higher video resolution, a lot more mega-pixels camera, a bigger aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.