Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-09-03 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), getting a general score of 78.8 against 74.1. The vivo X60 Pro body weights the same than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), but it's notably thinner. The vivo X60 Pro has a quite superior processing power than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
Moto X Pure Edition (2015) features a bit sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch. The vivo X60 Pro has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photos, a way more mega-pixels camera, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low light environments and higher video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 40 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.