Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| 2015-09-03 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015), having an 85.5 score against 74.1. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is noticeably newer and extremely thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Moto X Pure Edition (2015). The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better processing power than Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 2 more CPU cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a screen that is just as good as the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) one, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2246px and a little worse pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X Pure Edition (2015), because it has a 33% greater battery capacity. Moto X Pure Edition (2015) has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto X Pure Edition (2015) also counts with a much better resolution camera and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.