Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro is better than Moto X Style, getting a overall score of 84.9 against 74.1. Although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro is just a little heavier than the Moto X Style, it's incredibly thinner and notably newer. IPhone 11 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a better performing processing unit than Moto X Style, and although they both have 6 processing cores, the iPhone 11 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory and a 64-bit processor. The Moto X Style features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto X Style also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 128 GB.
Moto X Style has a little bit better camera than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures and videos in low light environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Moto X Style also counts with a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and photos and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Moto X Style, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.