Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than Moto X Style, with a overall score of 85 against 74.1. The iPhone 8 body is incredibly newer, lighter and much thinner than Moto X Style. The iPhone 8 features a greater processing power than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the iPhone 8 also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Motorola Moto X Style has a slightly better looking display than iPhone 8, because it has a bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a lot better pixels density. The Motorola Moto X Style has a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a way larger sensor and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
IPhone 8 features a much greater storage for apps and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Moto X Style counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.