Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2015-09-01 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 8.82 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has a score of 86.6, which is much better than the Moto X Style's 74.1 global score. IPhone SE (2022)'s body is way newer, extremely thinner and lighter than Moto X Style. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with an extremely better processor than Moto X Style, and although they both have a Hexa-Core processing unit, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also has a 64-bits processing unit and 1 GB more RAM memory.
Moto X Style features a slightly better display than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a bigger screen, much more pixels per inch in the display and a way better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Moto X Style counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal internal memory, the Moto X Style also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 128 GB.
The Motorola Moto X Style features just a bit better camera than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Moto X Style also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Moto X Style features a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 49 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.