Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2015-09-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black Glare |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone II is better than the Moto X Style, with an 88 score against 74.1. Asus ROG Phone II's construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner than the Moto X Style's, but it is also notably heavier. Asus ROG Phone II has a screen that is very similar to the Moto X Style one, because although the Asus ROG Phone II has a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a bigger display.
Asus ROG Phone II features a more powerful processing unit than Moto X Style, because it has a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. Asus ROG Phone II has a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Asus ROG Phone II counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto X Style, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Asus ROG Phone II also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, faster video frame rate, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
The Asus ROG Phone II features a way better battery lifetime than Moto X Style, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.