Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2015-09-01 | 2017-08-03 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone AR has a general score of 77.4, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto X Style's 74.1 score. Asus ZenFone AR's design is newer, much thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Moto X Style. The Asus ZenFone AR has just a little better performance than Moto X Style, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with 3 GB more RAM.
Asus ZenFone AR counts with a screen that's very similar to the Moto X Style one, they have a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a screen with the same size and an equal 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto X Style captures a bit better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera and a worse video quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Moto X Style also counts with a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Asus ZenFone AR counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone AR features a bit longer battery life than Moto X Style, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.