Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2015-09-01 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.06 x 3.00 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto X Style, with a overall score of 80.3 against 74.1. The Google Nexus 6P is a a lot thinner and a little bit lighter cellphone than Motorola Moto X Style, although they were released with only 2 months difference. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit superior CPU than Moto X Style, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Google Nexus 6P also has more CPU cores.
Google Nexus 6P counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto X Style. They have a greater quantity of pixels per display inch, the same 1440 x 2560 resolution and a same size display. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto X Style, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Google Nexus 6P has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto X Style, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Moto X Style has a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto X Style also counts with a camera with a lot higher 21 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.